Knowledge hub content
Engineer’s Playbook episodes, articles, podcasts and code insights: what is planned, who is writing it, where it is in review and how it performs once published.
Where this content is published
This screen plans and reviews the content items (episodes, articles, podcasts, code insights). The pages they appear on, their menu entries, search metadata and the publish step are managed in Website & CMS. An item marked “Published” here is live only once its page change has passed Review & publishing.
| Page that carries this content | State | Version | Last published | Menu placement |
|---|
Published
3 Playbook episodes are live on the current site
In production
ideas, drafts and reviews
Waiting for technical review
oldest waiting 6 days
Course page visits from content, 30 days
1,284
38 enrolments followed
| Title | Type | Academy | Author | Reviewer | Status | Publish date | SEO | Views, 30 days | Links to |
|---|
The three published Playbook titles are real. Everything else on this screen is sample planning data.
October 2026
Playbook or podcastArticleCode insightReview due
Cadence
- Playbook
- 2 episodes a month
- Articles
- 1 a week
- Code insights
- 1 a fortnight
- Digest email
- First Monday, campaign C-0309
No article is planned for the week of 25 Oct. Two ideas are unassigned on the board.
Timing suggestion. Publish the pipe stress article before 14 Oct so the second ML510 email can link to it. Open campaign
OutlineFull draftSEO title and descriptionLinkedIn postArabic summary
Code clauses are never quoted by AI; it marks where the reviewer should add the reference.
Draft outline
AI draft, not reviewed- Why a passing report is not the end of the check. A short case: restraint modelled as rigid, built as a rod hanger.
- Check 1: the model matches the isometric. Dimensions, wall thickness, insulation, fluid density.
- Check 2: load cases cover what the line will see. Sustained, expansion, occasional, hydrotest. Reviewer: add code reference
- Check 3: restraints behave as built. Gaps, friction, lift-off.
- Check 4: equipment nozzle loads. Compare with the vendor or standard allowables. Reviewer: add code reference
- Check 5: displacements and support loads make sense. Sagging, hot and cold positions.
- Where to learn the method. Link to .
SEO
Score 82pipe stress analysisstress report reviewCAESAR II load casesnozzle loads
Internal links suggested: ML510 course page, Stress Engineer learning path, “Understanding Component SIF” recording.